To use AdSense with Blogger, you are subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement that you entered into with Blogger and the AdSense terms. This includes a share of revenue, which is currently 0% to Blogger. You acknowledge that Blogger, may, in accordance with the terms of your agreement with Blogger, modify the revenue share percentage payable to you and in that case, Google's payment to you will change accordingly. You understand and agree that any ads revenue share on the shared traffic with Blogger will be paid directly to Blogger, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in your AdSense Terms of Service, which remains in full force and effect. Learn more about revenue share In addition to the above, your Ad Review Centre and policy violations data for the shared traffic on this site will be visible to Blogger. Unconscionable: U.S. Plan to Destroy $9.7 Million Worth of Contraceptives Sparks Outrage

Unconscionable: U.S. Plan to Destroy $9.7 Million Worth of Contraceptives Sparks Outrage


🧨 Unconscionable: U.S. Plan to Destroy $9.7 Million Worth of Contraceptives Sparks Outrage

In a stunning move that has sparked outrage among public health advocates, the U.S. government is reportedly planning to destroy $9.7 million worth of contraceptives, including IUDs and emergency contraception. The decision, driven by shifting political priorities and pressure from anti-abortion groups, is being condemned as not only wasteful—but dangerously irresponsible.





🚨 Why This Matters

These contraceptives were originally funded for global health programs aimed at reducing unplanned pregnancies and empowering women in low-resource settings. With millions of women lacking access to family planning tools, the destruction of perfectly usable medical supplies is being described as unconscionable and morally indefensible.

“This is not just a waste of taxpayer money. This is a direct attack on women’s health and autonomy,” said a spokesperson for a global reproductive rights NGO.

💊 What’s Being Destroyed?

The stockpile includes:

  • Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) such as IUDs
  • Emergency contraception pills (often referred to as “morning-after pills”)
  • Related reproductive health supplies

Many of these items are still within their shelf life and could be immediately deployed to health clinics around the world.

🏛️ Politics Over Public Health?

Critics point to the decision as part of a broader ideological campaign by conservative lawmakers to roll back reproductive rights. Since the fall of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. has seen a sharp rise in anti-abortion and anti-contraception policies—not only domestically but in its global aid strategy.

“Destroying life-saving contraceptives under the banner of ‘pro-life’ is the height of hypocrisy,” one advocate remarked.

🌍 Global Impact

The move could have catastrophic consequences for communities already facing high rates of maternal mortality, teenage pregnancy, and limited access to healthcare. According to the World Health Organization, access to contraception prevents over 200 million unintended pregnancies each year.

Now, with the U.S. pulling back support, millions of women—especially in developing countries—may lose access to critical reproductive care.

💬 The Public Reacts

Social media exploded in criticism:

  • “If you don’t want them, donate them. Don’t destroy them.”
  • “This is cruelty disguised as policy.”
  • “Let women decide for themselves.”

Even some moderate voices in politics are calling for an immediate reversal of the decision and a reassessment of U.S. global health priorities.


✊ What Can Be Done?

  • Contact your representatives. Demand transparency and accountability in reproductive health policy.
  • Support organizations that distribute contraceptives globally.
  • Stay informed and amplify the voices of those impacted.

💥 Bottom Line: Destroying nearly $10 million in contraceptives doesn’t just burn taxpayer money—it threatens lives, denies women their rights, and undermines decades of global health progress. In a world where access to healthcare is still unequal, this decision is nothing short of a scandal.

Post a Comment

0 Comments