1. India wasn’t part of the internal discussions
- India clarified that it did not participate in the deliberations within the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) that led to the condemnation of Israel.
- As such, it distanced itself from the statement, making it clear that it had no role in framing or approving the language used.
2. Maintaining a neutral, diplomatic stance
- India expressed concern over rising tensions between Israel and Iran but avoided assigning blame.
- It emphasized the importance of de-escalation and dialogue, reflecting its long-standing commitment to diplomacy over confrontation.
3. Balancing strategic ties with Israel and Iran
- With Israel: India has cultivated deep defense, technology, and intelligence ties with Israel, making it one of India's most important partners in West Asia.
- With Iran: At the same time, India has maintained strong energy, cultural, and regional connectivity ties with Iran—especially through the Chabahar Port project and regional security cooperation.
4. Upholding India’s independent foreign policy
- India has a tradition of non-alignment and strategic autonomy, especially in complex international disputes.
- It refrains from taking sides in bloc politics, allowing it to act based on its national interests rather than ideological alignment.
📌 Bottom line
India’s refusal to support the SCO condemnation of Israel was not an endorsement of military action. It was a strategic diplomatic choice that:
- Avoided participation in a process it disagreed with,
- Encouraged restraint and negotiation instead of confrontation,
- Protected its strategic partnerships with both Israel and Iran,
- Asserted its right to an independent foreign policy, free from bloc-level pressures.
0 Comments